Qube Markets

QBM (Qube Markets) holds regulatory licenses from ASIC (Australia), FSCA (South Africa), and FSC (Mauritius). It has a WikiFX core score of 6.05, with a risk control index of 9.15. However, user complaints about withdrawal difficulties have been reported. Traders should conduct their own due diligence before trading.

Yes, QBM is regulated. It holds an Inst Securities Trading License (STP) from ASIC (Australia) under license number 475072, a Derivatives Trading License (EP) from FSCA (South Africa) under number 54781, and a Securities Trading License (EP) from FSC (Mauritius) under number GB26205767. All licenses are currently listed as regulated or active.

The minimum deposit for QBM accounts is 0.01 units of the base currency (e.g., USD), as indicated for all three account types: ECN, PRO, and STD.

QBM supports MT5 (White Label) but does not support MT4.

Pros: QBM is regulated by multiple authorities (ASIC, FSCA, FSC), offers high leverage up to 1:1000, low spreads starting from 0.0 on the ECN account, supports MT5, and allows scalping and EA trading. Cons: User complaints regarding withdrawals have been reported, the overall WikiFX core score is 6.05, and no Islamic account is available.

Yes, there is at least one user complaint about withdrawal difficulties. Traders should consider this feedback when evaluating the broker.

QBM is registered in Australia and regulated by ASIC, FSCA, and FSC. It is not explicitly stated that it accepts US clients. US traders should verify with the broker directly.

QBM offers a low minimum deposit, multiple account types, and MT5 support, which can be beginner-friendly. However, the presence of user complaints and the risks of forex trading suggest that beginners should start with a demo account and conduct thorough research.

Spreads vary by account type: ECN account has 0.0 spread, PRO 1.2, and STD 1.7. Leverage is up to 1:1000. No additional fees are specified. Overall, spreads are competitive, especially on the ECN account.

QBM offers three account types: ECN (spread 0.0), PRO (spread 1.2), and STD (spread 1.7). All have a minimum deposit of 0.01, maximum leverage of 1:1000, and support scalping and EA trading. They cover forex, metals, energies, indices, and cryptocurrencies. No Islamic account is available.

To compare different brokers, investors can make comprehensive judgments from multiple dimensions such as regulatory qualifications, overall ratings, trading environment, account conditions, and user feedback. In general, priority should be given to regulatory status and license information, followed by WikiFX ratings and various indexes (such as risk control, software, and business indexes). At the same time, trading conditions (such as spreads and execution speed) and account information (such as minimum deposit and account types) should also be compared. In addition, user reviews, exposure records, and risk assessment information can also be considered to evaluate broker safety and trading experience from multiple aspects. The WikiFX platform also provides multi-dimensional broker comparison tools. Users can select different brokers for visual comparison and comprehensive analysis, so as to make decisions more efficiently.

To determine whether a broker is regulated, the key is to verify whether it holds a valid financial license. Investors can check the license number and status through the official websites of regulatory authorities (such as Financial Conduct Authority, Australian Securities and Investments Commission) to confirm whether the license is real and under valid supervision. It should be noted that some brokers may engage in license cloning or unauthorized operations, meaning they use another company's license or provide services in regions where they are not authorized. These situations also involve risks. In addition, investors can use WikiFX to check the broker's regulatory status, historical records, and risk ratings as supporting reference, so as to evaluate its compliance more comprehensively.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.