logo |

News

    Home   >     Industry    >     Main body

    Best Reason to Join a Startup? Not to Get Rich

    Abstract:A study finds that startup employees don‘t earn more in the long run. But that doesn’t mean the route isnt worth considering.

      Erin Lowry is the author of “Broke Millennial,” “Broke Millennial Takes On Investing” and the forthcoming “Broke Millennial Talks Money: Stories, Scripts and Advice to Navigate Awkward Financial Conversations.”

      Read more opinion

      Where do you see yourself in five years?

      The U.S. has such an infatuation with startup culture that many have wondered: Do startup employees earn more in the long run?

      The answer: No. Or so says a recent study that analyzed the long-term consequences of startup employment in Denmark from 1992 to 2012. It found those who joined a startup that had been operating for four or fewer years earned 17% less in the following decade compared with those who joined an established company. The researchers chose this particular setting because Denmarks economy, according to their paper, is representative of other high-income countries including the United States.

      As someone who spent two years of her early career with a startup — as one of its earliest employees — this finding struck a chord with me. And it should give others planning their careers pause as we continue into the pandemic recession.

      One key takeaway is how startups are particularly vulnerable to economic downturns, and how startup employees can find themselves on the job hunt at the same time employment becomes hard to land. Being unemployed in a recession has a significant and long-lasting impact on earnings and is one of the reasons startup employment can depress wages over the long term.

      More from

      {18}

      Oil Prices Are Only Going in One Direction

      Hold the Schadenfreude for America

      Americas Age of Anger Is Just Getting Started

      The Job That Awaits President Biden

      {18}

      Does this mean you shouldnt join a startup thats hiring? Not necessarily. A lot rides on your risk tolerance, expectations of a job and, perhaps most importantly, your other employment prospects.

      另一种常见的想法是启动提供显著的机会,学习与成长,因为有一个结构层次少,你很可能会身兼数职。不幸的是,研究发现,这种做法“全能战士”往往导致“万金油”的结果。这可能就是为什么在创业公司工作职位不总是意味着在成立公司类似的立场。

      当然,还有一种观点认为在启动工作为约不仅仅是直接补偿。你可以得到的股权,与潜在后来得到较大的回报。然而,这不是假表,如果你加入一个旧的公司。有些公司提供的员工股票购买计划或类似的激励措施是薪资丰厚的补偿之上。 {22} {777}{22}

      另一种常见的想法是启动提供显著的机会,学习与成长,因为有一个结构层次少,你很可能会身兼数职。不幸的是,研究发现,这种做法“全能战士”往往导致“万金油”的结果。这可能就是为什么在创业公司工作职位不总是意味着在成立公司类似的立场。

      {777}{21}{22}

      Of course, there‘s an argument that working at a startup is about more than just immediate compensation. You could get equity stake, with the potential to get a big payoff later. However, this isn’t off the table if you join an older firm. Some companies offer an employee stock purchase plan or similar incentives that pay handsomely on top of comp.

      {22}{777}

      {21}{22}

      {777}{24}

      Another common thought is that a startup provides significant opportunity for learning and growth because there‘s less of a structured hierarchy and you’ll likely wear multiple hats. Unfortunately, the study found that this “jack of all trades” approach often results in a “master of none” outcome. That may be why job titles at startups dont always translate to similar positions at established firms.

      {24}{25}

      {22}

      {25}

      One point in the pro column for working at a startup is the potential for an exciting environment with a unique sense of camaraderie. But it‘s important to consider how even this may one day peter out. Whether your company gets acquired by a large brand, or grows and becomes the establishment itself, the once laissez faire attitude that perhaps dominated your company culture will morph. That’s important to plan for. Of course, this is even if your startup makes it that long.

      There is, according to the study, an exception to the finding that startup employees earn less than those who work with established firms. It appears there is a sweet spot for joining a new venture: after it reaches about 50 employees but before it reaches its fifth year in business. Those who started at this point actually reported slightly higher earnings than those who opted to work at an established firm from the start of the study period.

      Perhaps one of the most discouraging takeaways from the entire study is wrapped up in these two sentences:

      The press loves to cover the janitor or receptionist who became rich from being employed at a high-tech startup. But these events are as likely and as representative of the common experience of startup employees as is the multi-million-dollar lottery winner among those buying tickets.

      Basically, it suggests that finding your fortune in a startup is akin to playing the lottery. But I would argue this is largely dependent on your industry, so its not entirely outside the realm of possibility that working for a startup will increase your long-term compensation.

      For those who work in tech, it makes sense why a startup is perhaps emotionally thrilling, but a gamble career-wise. After all, going to an established firm does mean high pay, usually competitive benefits and perhaps an employer stock purchase plan.

      {32} {35} 此列不一定反映的意见编辑部或彭博及其所有者的

      {36}

      埃林洛瑞在info@brokemillennial.com

      {35} 此列不一定反映的意见编辑部或彭博及其所有者的

      {41} {36} {41} {42} 埃林洛瑞在info@brokemillennial.com {42}{33}

      What about those of us in other industries like media? When I moved to a startup, my salary went up 30% and within two years I was earning nearly double what I had prior to joining. This helped reshape my perception of what I could earn. Yes, the exception does not make the rule. However, its important to consider that startups employ a lot of people in various industries and for some of us, that leap might actually make a lot of sense.

      {33}

        {35}

        {32}

        {35}{36}

        This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

        {36}

        {32}

        {39}

        To contact the author of this story:

        {39}

        {41}

        {36}

        {41}{42}

        Erin Lowry at info@brokemillennial.com

        {42}

        {36}

        To contact the editor responsible for this story:

        Nicole Torres at ntorres51@bloomberg.net

    United Arab Emirates Dirham

    • United Arab Emirates Dirham
    • Australia Dollar
    • Canadian Dollar
    • Swiss Franc
    • Chinese Yuan
    • Danish Krone
    • Euro
    • British Pound
    • Hong Kong Dollar
    • Hungarian Forint
    • Japanese Yen
    • South Korean Won
    • Mexican Peso
    • Malaysian Ringgit
    • Norwegian Krone
    • New Zealand Dollar
    • Polish Zloty
    • Russian Ruble
    • Saudi Arabian Riyal
    • Swedish Krona
    • Singapore Dollar
    • Thai Baht
    • Turkish Lira
    • United States Dollar
    • South African Rand

    United States Dollar

    • United Arab Emirates Dirham
    • Australia Dollar
    • Canadian Dollar
    • Swiss Franc
    • Chinese Yuan
    • Danish Krone
    • Euro
    • British Pound
    • Hong Kong Dollar
    • Hungarian Forint
    • Japanese Yen
    • South Korean Won
    • Mexican Peso
    • Malaysian Ringgit
    • Norwegian Krone
    • New Zealand Dollar
    • Polish Zloty
    • Russian Ruble
    • Saudi Arabian Riyal
    • Swedish Krona
    • Singapore Dollar
    • Thai Baht
    • Turkish Lira
    • United States Dollar
    • South African Rand
    Current Rate  :
    --
    Amount
    United Arab Emirates Dirham
    Available
    -- United States Dollar
    Risk Warning

    The Database of WikiFX comes from the official regulatory authorities , such as the FCA, ASIC, etc. The published content is also based on fairness, objectivity and fact. WikiFX doesn't ask for PR fees, advertising fees, ranking fees, data cleaning fees and other illogical fees. WikiFX will do its utmost to maintain the consistency and synchronization of database with authoritative data sources such as regulatory authorities, but does not guarantee the data to be up to date consistently.

    Given the complexity of forex industry, some brokers are issued legal licenses by cheating regulation institutes. If the data published by WikiFX are not in accordance with the fact, please click "Complaints "and "Correction" to inform us. We will check immediately and release the results.

    Foreign exchange, precious metals and over-the-counter (OTC) contracts are leveraged products, which have high risks and may lead to losses of your investment principal. Please invest rationally.

    Special Note, the content of the Wikifx site is for information purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. The Forex broker is chosen by the client. The client understands and takes into account all risks arising with Forex trading is not relevant with WikiFX, the client should bear full responsibility for their consequences.