简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
ANGEL PRO FX Review 2026: Unregulated Risk and Withdrawal Complaints
Abstract:ANGEL PRO FX is an unregulated broker with a very low WikiFX score of 1.22. It presents severe risk signals due to active complaints from Indian traders regarding blocked withdrawals and demands for additional upfront fees.

ANGEL PRO FX currently shows a very low WikiFX score of 1.22 and operates without any verified regulatory license. Indian users have actively reported serious withdrawal issues, including allegations that the broker demands extra fees to release funds. Due to the lack of oversight and severe negative feedback, this broker presents a high risk to retail traders.
For Indian traders checking this Forex broker, the main priority is verifying whether funds are safe. In this ANGEL PRO FX review, we look at the available data from WikiFX, which shows a recently established 2025 entity that operates from Canada but holds significant influence in India.
Regulation and Safety
The available regulation details matter heavily when evaluating any trading platform. WikiFX records confirm that ANGEL PRO FX is currently not overseen by any recognized financial regulator. Without regulation, Indian traders face major risks because there is no official authority to step in if a dispute arises. Operating as an unregulated entity means that the safety of customer deposits cannot be verified, leaving traders entirely reliant on the broker's goodwill.
WikiFX Score and Risk Signals
WikiFX assigns ANGEL PRO FX a very low score of 1.22. This score directly reflects the lack of regulatory licenses and the presence of severe user complaints. Furthermore, its comprehensive influence ranking is a low “D”. These risk signals are highly discouraging for anyone comparing options in the market and suggest that traders should exercise extreme caution.
Trader Complaints and Exposure Cases
The most alarming evidence against this broker comes from recent exposure cases submitted by Indian traders to WikiFX in January 2026. Multiple reports describe a severe withdrawal pattern consistent with fraud allegations.
One trader reported investing $4,000 four months prior, with their dashboard eventually showing apparent profits of up to $35,000. However, after requesting a withdrawal three times over three months, no funds were received. Worse, the user alleged the company threatened them, demanding an additional $6,000 payment in order to process the withdrawal—a major red flag often associated with advance-fee extraction tactics. The user blatantly labeled the broker a “big scam” and warned others not to trust them.
Support and Account Access
For those attempting an account access or using the angelprofx.in login portal, users should note the customer service limitations. While they offer support in English via email (info@angelprofx.in) and a UK WhatsApp number (+44 20 3757 5705), WikiFX data shows that while most questions eventually receive answers, customer wait times are significantly long. Long response times combined with unresolved withdrawal disputes add significant friction for retail investors trying to recover funds.
Final Verdict: Should Indian Traders Trust ANGEL PRO FX?
Based on the available evidence, ANGEL PRO FX presents extreme risk signals. It has zero regulatory oversight, a very low WikiFX score of 1.22, and confirmed user complaints detailing blocked withdrawals and demands for extra payments. The available material strongly suggests an unsafe trading environment.
Status changes daily. Before depositing, check the WikiFX App for the latest real-time certificate and broker risk updates.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
