Abstract:Image copyrightGetty Images The UK could be offered a Brexit delay to 22 May on the condition MPs ap
Image copyrightGetty Images
The UK could be offered a Brexit delay to 22 May on the condition MPs approve the PM's deal next week, the latest draft European Council document says.
But if MPs vote the withdrawal deal down for a third time, EU leaders would back a shorter delay until 12 April.
The draft conclusions seen by the BBC say the UK would then be expected to “indicate a way forward before this date”.
But they are still subject to change as discussions continue.
The UK is due to leave the EU on 29 March if no extension to the Article 50 process is agreed.
Live updates: PM appeals to EU leaders
Your really simple guide to Brexit
Brexit: What could happen next?
Discussions continued over dinner amid reports of disagreement between the 27 other EU leaders about the details.
They are understood to have discussed potential dates of 7 May or a longer delay until the end of the year.
In Brussels, Prime Minister Theresa May spoke to leaders to try to get their backing for a delay, after MPs twice rejected the withdrawal deal she has negotiated with the European Union.
BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said EU leaders were taking ages to agree on whether to give Theresa May a short extension to the Article 50 process, in order to try to get the withdrawal deal through the Commons, and whether to allow a potential long extension, if the deal is defeated again.
Skip Twitter post by @bbclaurak
1. In the finest summit tradition, this is all now running very, very late - EU leaders taking a long time to decide how long the short extension should be, and what that means in the short term, for future potential long extension - yes, you read that right
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) March 21, 2019
Report
End of Twitter post by @bbclaurak
Prime Minister Theresa May spoke to EU leaders in Brussels to try to get their backing for a delay until 30 June, after MPs twice rejected the withdrawal deal she has negotiated with the European Union.
She has told European Council President Donald Tusk that she needs more time to get her deal agreed by MPs and passed into law.
The BBC's Brussels correspondent Adam Fleming said Mrs May had spoken to EU leaders for 90 minutes and was asked several times what her contingency plans were if she lost the third “meaningful vote” on her deal in Parliament.
The BBC's Europe editor Katya Adler said she had been told that a short extension until 7 May will be offered, unless by 11 April the UK says it will take part in European Parliamentary elections, in which case the delay could be until the end of the year.
Image Copyright @BBCkatyaadler@BBCkatyaadler
Report
Image Copyright @BBCkatyaadler@BBCkatyaadler
Report
French President Emmanuel Macron has warned that if MPs vote down Mrs May's EU withdrawal agreement next week, the UK will leave without a deal.
“In the case of a negative British vote then we'd be heading to a no deal. We all know it. And it's essential to be clear in these days and moments,” said Mr Macron as he arrived at the summit.
EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said that a short Brexit delay “should be conditional on a positive vote next week in the House of Commons”.
“We have done our best, now the solution is in London,” he said.
Image copyrightAFPImage caption What will EU leaders do if UK MPs reject the deal for a third time? What is the Plan B?
By Reality Check's Chris Morris
It's been clear that EU leaders believe a short extension of the Article 50 process is possible.
But there have been different views about how long “short” should be. And a strict interpretation of the law rules out an extension until the end of June, if the UK doesn't take part in European elections.
That's why the 27 EU leaders offer a possible extension until 22 May, the day before voting in the elections begins.
For now, the focus is on the condition that an extension can be offered only if UK MPs vote for the Brexit deal next week. But EU leaders know the numbers don't look good for the government.
So, what does their Plan B look like? President Macron said that a “no” vote from MPs would guide us towards no deal.
But would he say the same thing in a week's time, when there may have to be another emergency EU summit just before the Brexit deadline?
A longer extension - an idea rejected by Theresa May - remains a possibility. But the legal and political calculations that surround it are complex, and difficult to predict.
On her arrival in Brussels, Mrs May said she “sincerely hopes” the UK will leave the EU with a deal and she is still “working on” ensuring Parliament's agreement.
She said that she had “personal regret” over her request to delay Brexit, but said it would allow time for MPs to make a “final choice”.
Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionJeremy Hunt says no prime minister “in living memory” has been tested like Theresa May
Mrs May said: “A short extension gives us that opportunity to decide to leave the European Union, to deliver on that result of that referendum and I sincerely hope that will be with a negotiated deal.”
She added: “I'm still working on ensuring that Parliament can agree a deal so that we can leave in an orderly way.”
Revoke Article 50 petition crashes site
John Bercow: MPs are not traitors
Corbyn calls for Brexit compromise
Earlier, speaking in the German Parliament, Angela Merkel said the EU could meet Mrs May's request to delay Brexit if in the next week there was a “positive vote” on the withdrawal agreement in the UK Parliament.
The German Chancellor said European elections at the end of May would have to be considered during discussions on the suggested extension deadline of 30 June, adding: “But of course we can certainly talk about a short term extension.”
Image copyrightBrexit calendar
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.