EC markets
- Hedging is marked as available on all three account entries
- Each account records spread, minimum deposit and leverage
- Scalping and expert advisors are recorded alongside hedging
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Hedging permission sounds like a single yes or no, but it is recorded per account. A broker can allow a locked position on one account and block it on another, so the useful question is which account carries the permission and under what margin rules. This ranking covers six brokers whose records mark hedging as available on at least one account.
All six scores were requested with the United States country setting, so the figures share one scope. The table keeps the account-level hedging flags visible, names what each record still leaves unstated, and does not treat a missing field as permission granted.
Every record is fetched again when the page is built, in English with the United States country setting, and the score shown is the detail-page value from that request. Hedging eligibility comes from one structured field only, the account-level flag; marketing pages and generated summaries play no part. Scores appear out of ten with two decimals, in the resolved order. Licence rows count only Regulated or Offshore Regulation entries, with revoked and unverified records left out. What follows ranks recorded scores and account flags; it does not measure hedging costs, execution or swap treatment.
ECN, STD and PRO accounts all record hedging as supported
Leverage of 1:1000 is recorded on every account
Both recorded accounts mark hedging as available
Leverage differs between the ECN and Standard accounts
Four accounts, all recording hedging as supported
A single 1:400 leverage cap applies across the accounts
Hedging is recorded on the forex accounts but not on Stock
Micro and Standard accounts record leverage of 1:1000
All four accounts record hedging as supported
An Islamic account is listed beside Raw Spread and Standard
more
Forex Broker
License
Minimum Spread
Maximum Leverage
Minimum Deposit
Open Account
Details
Compare
Licence records: FCA 571881; FMA 197465; ASIC 414198; FSA SD009; FSCA 51886
Broker summary: EC Markets records hedging as supported on all three of its accounts, ECN, STD and PRO, alongside scalping and expert advisors. Spreads start at 0.0 on the ECN and PRO entries and 1.0 on the STD entry, each with a minimum deposit of 0.01 and leverage of 1:1000. That makes it the clearest account-level record of the six, because the permission and the trading terms sit in the same rows.
Hedging does not remove exposure. A locked position still consumes margin on both legs. At 1:1000 a small adverse move can absorb a large share of the balance, so the strategy can fail on margin rather than on direction. Commission and swap charges are not recorded, and the cost of holding two positions overnight is exactly what a hedged trade depends on. Ask the onboarding entity how offsetting positions are margined, and for the swap schedule on both legs.
Pros
Drawbacks
Licence records: FCA 744501; ASIC 496371; VFSC 40354; FSCA 51545
Broker summary: GTCFX records hedging as available on both of its accounts. The ECN entry shows a spread of 0.0 with leverage of 1:500, while the Standard entry shows a spread of 1.0 with leverage of 1:2000. Scalping and expert advisors are marked as supported on each, and four platforms are listed, including MT5, MT4 and cTrader. No minimum deposit appears on either entry.
The leverage split deserves attention before any hedged position is opened. A 1:2000 cap on the Standard account changes both the size a balance can support and the cash effect of an adverse move. The figure may belong to one entity rather than to every client. Neither entry records commission or swap terms, so the cost of carrying two legs overnight is unknown from this data. That cost often decides whether a hedge is worth holding.
Pros
Drawbacks
Licence records: FSA SD093; FCA 760555; CYSEC 285/15; ASIC 418036; FSCA 44816; SFC BUM667; SERC 040
Broker summary: ATFX records four accounts, Raw Pro, Raw, Edge and Standard, and marks hedging, scalping and expert advisors as available on every one. Spreads start at 0.0, 0.0, 0.8 and 1.1 respectively, and all four carry the same leverage of 1:400. That shared cap makes the accounts easier to compare than the entries where leverage changes with the account type.
The missing figures are the constraint. No minimum deposit is recorded, and commission, swap and instrument coverage are absent, so the cost of running two positions at once cannot be calculated from this record. A 1:400 cap also means a hedged pair consumes margin on both legs at a modest leverage. That limits the position a balance can support and can force a reduction at the least convenient moment. The permission is only the first question: the swap schedule for the chosen account decides the rest.
Pros
Drawbacks
Licence records: CMA 233; CYSEC 120/10; ASIC 443670; DFSA F003484; FSC 8557558; FSCA 49976
Broker summary: XM shows why hedging has to be checked per account. Three entries, Micro, Standard and Ultra Low Spread Standard & Micro, record hedging as supported, but the Stock account records it as unavailable. The Micro and Standard accounts show leverage of 1:1000 with minimum funding of 0.1 and 0.01, and the Ultra Low Spread entries start from a spread of 0.6 rather than 1.0.
A reader who assumes the whole brand behaves the same way would be wrong on the Stock entry. The same caution applies to platform access, since a Stock account is not a forex account. Spread figures are starting values without commission, and swap terms are not recorded, which matters because a hedged position is usually held across at least one rollover. A green light on hedging is not a cost answer; ask the chosen account for its swap schedule.
Pros
Drawbacks
Licence records: ASIC 335692; CYSEC 362/18; FSA SD018
Broker summary: IC Markets marks hedging, scalping and expert advisors as available on all four accounts: cTrader, Raw Spread, Standard and Islamic. Leverage is recorded as 1:500 on three entries, while the Standard account shows 1:1000. Only the Islamic entry carries a spread, from 0.0; the other three leave spread, commission and minimum deposit blank, so the accounts cannot be priced from this record.
The gaps matter most for a hedged strategy, which depends on the cost of holding positions rather than on entry alone. Swap terms are absent, including on the Islamic account where they would define the product, and a 1:1000 figure on one account changes the margin consumed by two open legs. The flag records permission, not a cost advantage. Ask the specific entity for its schedule before relying on it.
Pros
Drawbacks
Licence records: ASIC 428901; CIMA 1383491; VFSC 700271; FSCA 51268
Broker summary: Vantage records hedging as supported on all four accounts: SWAP FREE, PRO ECN, RAW ECN and Standard STP. The two ECN entries quote spreads from 0.0 and the STP entry from 1.0, each with a minimum deposit of 0.01. Leverage is stored as a single string that varies by entity, from 1:2000 for the Asia-Pacific company to 1:30 for retail clients booked under the United Kingdom and Australian companies.
That range is the part most likely to be misread. A hedged pair under a 1:30 cap consumes margin far faster than the same pair under 1:2000. The strategy's viability therefore depends on which company holds the account, not on the brand. Swap terms are absent even on the account labelled SWAP FREE, and commission is unrecorded, which leaves the holding cost of a locked position unresolved. Which entity would hold the account? That answer sets the cap and the schedule that follow.
Pros
Drawbacks
It means the account record marks the holding of offsetting positions as permitted, so a long and a short in the same instrument can be open at the same time. It does not describe how those positions are margined, whether they net for margin purposes, or what the swap treatment is. Those details sit in the account agreement and have to be requested rather than inferred from the flag.
No. Permission follows the entity and its regulator, and the same brand can offer hedging under one company and restrict it under another. The records here show the flag per account, not per country, so a reader should confirm which company would hold the account and whether hedging is offered to clients booked there.
Not always. XM records hedging as available on its Micro, Standard and Ultra Low Spread accounts but not on its Stock account, which is the clearest example here of a permission that changes within one brand. Check the specific account row rather than the broker-level summary.
Both legs typically consume margin unless the entity applies offsetting-position rules, so a hedged pair can use more margin than a single position. Higher leverage such as 1:1000 or 1:2000 increases the position a balance can support while also magnifying the cash effect of an adverse move, and a lower cap such as 1:30 reverses that. Confirm the margin treatment in writing.
No. The flag records permission only. Spreads, commissions and swap charges are separate fields, and several records here leave them blank, so the cost of holding two positions overnight cannot be derived from the permission itself. The swap schedule is usually the decisive cost for a hedged position and should be obtained before the strategy is run.
Confirm the account that carries the permission, the company that would hold it, the margin treatment of offsetting positions and the swap schedule for both legs. Check the leverage cap for that entity, the stop-out rule and any restriction on holding positions across rollover. Then test the logic on a demo account under the same terms before committing funds.
WikiFX supplies the broker records used in this ranking. The article was written from structured fields rather than copied from the API's generated summaries or template advantages. The topic comes from the supplied upstream workbook and the competitor page was not retrieved, so its shortlist, chapter order and questions were not verified; the six positions, section order and questions are editorial choices for this edition. Hedging eligibility was read only from the account-level field. Scores and account data were requested again at build time, and editorial review of the wording remains necessary before publication.
Forex and leveraged trading involve risk and can result in financial losses. This article is for information only and is not investment advice or a recommendation to open an account. Broker records change, and a recorded hedging permission does not establish that the strategy suits any reader. Confirm the relevant entity, account terms and current conditions before making a decision.
Best Forex Brokers for Hedging in 2026
Rewrite of the ForexBrokers.com hedging guide: which brokers allow opposing positions, how the picks were tested, and the pros and cons recorded for each.

Best Hedging Forex Brokers: Recorded Permissions
Six brokers whose account records mark hedging as available, with the leverage limits, margin treatment and swap costs that still need checking.

Best MT4 Brokers: A WikiFX Score Ranking
Ten MT4 brokers ranked by WikiFX score, with the licence entity behind each one, the recorded account terms and the fields the records leave blank.

Regulated Forex Brokers: What Licence Records Show
Six brokers with active licence records, compared by licensed entity, reference and account data, and what a licence does not cover.