SEA GLOBAL

According to WikiFX data, SEA GLOBAL (Sea Global Ltd.) currently carries a WikiFX core score of 4.05, with a regulatory index of 4.0, a risk-control index of 8.8 and a license index of 2.5, and it is classified as regulated. The brand is registered in Saint Lucia and shows an operating history of 1–2 years. The license listed under this brand is held by Sea Global Ltd. — a Forex license registered with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of Saint Lucia under number 2025-00352, with a license type recorded as Legal Opinion (LO) and a status listed as Regulated. Regulatory protection depends on the specific legal entity holding the license, the current license status, the product involved and the client's jurisdiction, so a listed license status or a score should not be read as a guarantee of safety or reliability. Overall, WikiFX assessment indicates a regulated but relatively young operation whose oversight profile is tied to one entity and one license type, which supports a qualified rather than an unconditional view of its safety and reliability.

According to WikiFX data, SEA GLOBAL is classified as regulated. The license information listed contains one entry: a Forex license held by Sea Global Ltd., registered with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of Saint Lucia under regulation number 2025-00352, with a status recorded as Regulated and a license type described as Legal Opinion (LO). No abnormal licenses are listed, and no additional licenses from other regulators appear in the available information. WikiFX assessment indicates a regulatory index of 4.0 and a license index of 2.5 for this brand. Because the license is held by a specific legal entity and the type recorded is a Legal Opinion rather than a full investment-services authorization in a major jurisdiction, the scope of regulatory protection may differ from that of brokers holding broader licenses, and the entity, license type and current status can be verified directly with the relevant regulator.

According to WikiFX data, SEA GLOBAL lists three account types with different entry conditions: the Plus account with an entry condition of $100, the Standard account with an entry condition of $500, and the Pro account with an entry condition of $1,000. On this basis, the lowest minimum deposit currently specified is $100, which applies to the Plus account, while higher account tiers require larger initial deposits. Entry conditions may vary by entity, region and account type, so the applicable minimum should be confirmed with the broker's official information before opening an account.

WikiFX data for SEA GLOBAL does not explicitly list supported trading platforms such as MT4 or MT5 in its license or account information, and the available account entries do not state a platform name. The brand is assigned a software index of 6.32, and one user-submitted post on WikiFX refers to an MT5 trading account in connection with this brand, but an official platform list is not currently publicly specified in the available information. Users who need confirmation of MT4 or MT5 availability, including whether it differs by account type or legal entity, can verify this through the broker's official website or customer service.

According to WikiFX data, the following points can be noted for SEA GLOBAL. Pros: 1. Regulatory status: the brand is classified as regulated, with a Forex license held by Sea Global Ltd. registered with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of Saint Lucia under number 2025-00352, and no abnormal licenses are listed. 2. Multiple account tiers: the Plus, Standard and Pro accounts provide different entry conditions ($100, $500 and $1,000) together with different spread and leverage settings, which offers some flexibility in matching an account to trading style. 3. Trading features and risk metrics: hedging (lock positions), scalping and EA use are indicated as permitted across the listed account types, and WikiFX assessment shows a risk-control index of 8.8. Cons: 1. Operating history: the brand shows an operating history of 1–2 years, which is relatively short compared with longer-established market participants. 2. License profile: the listed license is a Legal Opinion (LO) registered in Saint Lucia, an offshore jurisdiction, with a license index of 2.5, so the scope of oversight may be narrower than that of a full investment-services license in a major jurisdiction. 3. User-reported experience: a user-submitted exposure on WikiFX describes a declined withdrawal request and subsequent account suspension; this is a single individual report and should be weighed together with other sources rather than treated as a general conclusion about the brand. These points describe structural and reported characteristics and do not constitute a guarantee of performance, safety or suitability.

According to WikiFX data, one user-submitted exposure entry is listed for SEA GLOBAL. That post states that the user deposited funds, generated profits, requested a withdrawal of $1,000, and that the withdrawal request was declined, with the trading account said to have been closed or suspended. A separate user-submitted post gives positive feedback, describing low margin requirements, narrow spreads and smooth deposit and withdrawal experiences. These entries reflect individual user experiences rather than an audited record, and outcomes may vary by account, entity and jurisdiction, so they are best considered alongside other sources of information.

Due to the temporary lack of publicly available data, it is not possible to determine whether it is available in the United States. In general, to judge whether a broker can be used in a certain region, you can refer to the following aspects: 1. Regulatory qualifications: Check whether the broker is regulated by major regulators (such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the United States). 2. Legal restrictions: Different countries and regions have different laws and regulations on forex and CFD trading. Some platforms may not provide services in certain regions. 3. Account opening information: Check whether the broker allows users from that region to register accounts. 4. Official announcements and customer service: Confirm the local usage policy through the broker's official website or customer service. 5. User feedback: Refer to other users' experience and complaints in that region. You can use the information above to judge its availability in the United States. At the same time, you can follow WikiFX updates on regulatory and availability data to get more accurate reference.

According to WikiFX data, SEA GLOBAL offers a Plus account with an entry condition of $100, alongside Standard ($500) and Pro ($1,000) accounts, which means a comparatively lower initial deposit tier is available. Hedging, scalping and EA use are indicated as permitted across the listed account types, and WikiFX assessment shows a risk-control index of 8.8. At the same time, the maximum leverage listed for the Standard account is 1:1000 and 1:500 for the Plus and Pro accounts, and higher leverage can amplify both gains and losses, which is a relevant consideration for less experienced traders. The brand also shows a short operating history of 1–2 years and a license recorded as a Legal Opinion (LO) in Saint Lucia, so the scope of regulatory protection depends on the specific entity and license type. Whether the broker provides demo accounts, educational materials or beginner-specific protections is not currently publicly specified in the available information. On balance, the low entry threshold is a practical feature for newcomers, but leverage levels, the short operating history and the license profile mean beginners should assess these factors carefully and verify details with the broker and relevant regulator before proceeding.

According to WikiFX data, spread levels differ by account type: the Plus account lists spreads from 30, the Standard account lists 25, and the Pro account lists spreads from 20, with the unit not stated in the available information. This suggests the Pro tier presents the tightest listed spread figure and the Plus tier the widest, although the figures cover different account conditions and entry thresholds. Information on commissions, swap or overnight charges, and any non-trading fees such as account or withdrawal charges is not currently publicly specified in the available information, so a complete assessment of total trading cost cannot be made from spreads alone. Because overall cost depends on the combination of spread, commission, swap and any additional charges, users may compare the fee schedule applicable to their chosen account type directly with the broker.

According to WikiFX data, SEA GLOBAL lists three account types: Plus, Standard and Pro. The Plus account has an entry condition of $100, spreads from 30 and maximum leverage of 1:500. The Standard account has an entry condition of $500, spreads listed at 25 and maximum leverage of 1:1000. The Pro account has an entry condition of $1,000, spreads from 20 and maximum leverage of 1:500. All three accounts are indicated as permitting lock positions, scalping and EA use, and none of them is listed as an Islamic account. In short, the tiers differ mainly in the entry deposit required, the spread level and the maximum leverage offered. Other conditions that may affect account selection, such as commission structure, swap charges and available base currencies, are not currently publicly specified in the available information.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

Common forex regulatory authorities include the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). These regulatory authorities usually maintain relatively high regulatory standards, and brokers regulated by them generally have higher compliance levels. You can check broker ranking lists under different regulators on the WikiFX platform, such as brokers regulated by FCA, ASIC, and CySEC, so as to compare brokers under different regulatory backgrounds more clearly and make safer choices.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.