FCA-Regulated Forex Brokers Are Declining — 31 Platforms to Avoid
As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:An anonymous trader alleges FXPrimus is withholding a profit of $8870, citing issues with the customer panel. This raises concerns about the broker's reliability despite its regulatory status and market reputation. Such incidents can impact trust within the trading community. Prompt resolution is crucial for both the trader's rightful earnings and FXPrimus's market standing.

In the intricate world of online forex trading, numerous concerns often arise among traders, both experienced and new. At the heart of these is the necessity for reliable brokers that uphold the trust and confidence of their users. FXPrimus is one such name in the industry that has built a reputation for itself. However, even the most esteemed entities can sometimes face issues that can potentially tarnish their image. One such concern has recently come to light.
An anonymous trader has reached out, drawing attention to an unsettling experience with FXPrimus. They claim that the broker is holding back a considerable amount - 8870 USD to be precise. This amount was profited from an investment the trader made on their account with the login number 4614490. The trader expected a smooth withdrawal process, given FXPrimus's regulatory status and positive reputation in the market. However, contrary to expectations, they encountered a hurdle when they were informed of a problem with the customer panel, making it impossible for them to access and withdraw their funds.
“[...] FXPrimus company does not pay the 8870 USD profit I earned after the investment I made to my account with login number 4614490. I would be glad if you could help me withdraw my money by saying there is a problem with the customer panel.” - Anonymous Trader

Given their status in the market, this issue has the potential to dent FXPrimus's reputation. Trust and reliability are paramount in the trading world, especially when significant amounts of money are involved. FXPrimus, being a regulated broker, is bound by several regulatory guidelines and has an obligation to its customers.
Traders put their hard-earned money into these platforms, anticipating not just profit but also seamless service, which includes hassle-free withdrawals. Anomalies, like the one stated, can lead to skepticism among potential and current users.

It is essential for both parties involved - the trader and FXPrimus - to address this situation promptly. For the trader, it's about retrieving their rightfully earned profit. For FXPrimus, it's a matter of upholding their trust and standing in the market.
We really hope that the concerned trader and FXPrimus can reach an agreement. Brokers must understand that each event, no matter how isolated, has repercussions for the worldwide trading community. At the same time, we encourage traders to maintain detailed records of their transactions and interactions to ensure they have the appropriate proof in the event of a dispute.
Note: We encourage traders to do their own research, stay informed, and never hesitate to bring such issues to light. It not only helps them but also contributes to a transparent and reliable trading ecosystem.
You may access all the complaints sent by FXPrimus traders.
Link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/4051155469.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.

Has Dbinvesting failed to honor your fund withdrawal requests? Did you notice that the broker remained fine when you were losing and turned worse as your numbers gained on the Dbinvesting login? Did the broker wipe out your profits and block your trading account? Many such allegations from users across India, the US and other regions have become headlines on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. To make it comprehensive, we have prepared an in-depth investigation report into user allegations, the company’s products and services, and, importantly, regulatory status, in this Dbinvesting review article.

Times are tough for the rupee as it again slipped to 95 against the USD towards the end of April 2026 after some gains due to the RBI-led interventions early this month. The depreciation is largely attributable to surging crude oil prices. The prices climbed to their 3-year high over the US-Iran conflict. On April 30, 2026, the rupee opened at 95.02 mark against the USD, sliding 0.2% from its previous day’s ending at 94.84 against the greenback. As the day progressed, it slipped further to a new record low of 95.32 against the USD, beating the earlier fall of 95.22 in March 2026.

When you ask, "Is AssetsFX legit?", you're asking an important question about keeping your funds safe. After looking at all the available information, the answer is concerning: AssetsFX shows serious risks that traders should worry about. Our research found multiple problems that can't be overlooked. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers worldwide, gives AssetsFX only 2.44 points out of 10. They also warn users: "Low score, please stay away!" This very low rating isn't random. It comes from two main problems: the company doesn't have proper licenses from respected authorities, and many users have complained about losing funds. This article will explain the evidence behind this rating, giving you the facts you need to make a smart choice and protect your investments.