I. Course of Events (True and Complete Facts) During my normal and compliant trading on the Maihui platform, I encountered severe market volatility, a critical high-risk period requiring timely adding to positions, hedging, and stop-losses. However, the Maihui platform maliciously and unilaterally closed my deposit channel, directly prohibiting me from recharging and from taking remedial action on my positions. Because the platform forcibly locked down the deposit function, I could not rescue my positions, directly leading to continuous account losses, liquidation, and large losses. II. After Seeking Compensation to Defend My Rights, the Platform Maliciously Retaliated by Banning My Account After the platform artificially caused my losses, I normally submitted a loss compensation demand to the platform and communicated to defend my rights. The account manager helped me apply to the company. The first application was rejected. I told the account manager that I would call the police; if I had not said I would call the police, I estimate they would not have given a single cent. The next day I asked customer service, and customer service said it was being applied for. For this inability to deposit, they would compensate me 10,000 U. (They also made me sign an agreement. Out of helplessness I signed it. I did not expect that after signing it they would ban my account, but the agreement did not state that my account would be banned after compensation.) Now they have frozen my account. Will the 370,000 U I deposited over time just be swallowed by them? Also, deposits were delayed by 4-50 minutes before arriving; they only arrived after the market had moved. This was intentional, right? III. Final Actual Loss Result After a series of non-compliant operations by the platform—maliciously shutting down the deposit channel, artificially intervening in trading, and subsequently banning the account: My cumulative direct loss on the Maihui platform amounted to as much as 370,000 USDT (370,000 U). All losses were caused by the platform's non-compliant manipulation, not normal market trading risk. IV. Multiple Serious Violations by the Platform 1. Artificial intervention in the trading mechanism: Forcibly closing the deposit entrance during a critical period of market volatility, deliberately making it impossible for users to control positions and inevitably causing liquidation—this constitutes back-end market manipulation by the platform. 2. Retaliatory banning of user accounts: When a user normally sought compensation to defend their rights, the platform directly banned the account, deprived all permissions, and maliciously blocked the user from defending their rights. 3, Suspected virtual against-the-house scheme: I repeatedly demanded that the platform produce proof of real market connection, LP liquidity agreements, and order entry receipts. Customer service left everything on read without replying, deliberately evaded, and did not dare to provide evidence, which is sufficient to prove that the platform's trading is not real and is suspected of being an internal against-the-house scam platform. 5. Inducing the signing of a liability waiver agreement: The platform once induced me to sign an unequal 'goodwill compensation agreement', attempting to silence me with a small amount and cover up the platform's major violations. V. Formal Rights-Protection Demands 1. Demand that the Maihui platform fully compensate all my losses: 370,000 USDT (370,000 U); Note: If any images or chat records are needed, I have them all. Now customer service directly does not reply to me; no matter what I ask, they say nothing