On the evening of February 11th, I placed trades during the Non-Farm Payroll (NFP) release. Based on analysis of previous data releases, I anticipated a bearish outcome, so I deposited $1,000—a small amount—to go short. As expected, the market moved in my favor, resulting in a profit of $6,747.09. The entire process involved manual trading, purely capitalizing on the data release. However, on Friday, the platform emailed me claiming that my trading violated their rules, citing "abuse of negative balance protection" as the reason for deducting my profits. First, I was in a profitable position with no negative balance involved. Second, if the platform considered this a violation, they could have simply reduced leverage or restricted trading in advance—a measure I would have understood. But to deduct profits only after they were earned based on such a rationale is unreasonable. Does this mean that in regular trading, whenever a trader achieves significant profits—especially during high-volatility periods like current geopolitical conflicts—the platform can arbitrarily label it as "abuse of negative balance protection" and confiscate the gains? Therefore, I demand the return of my trading profits totaling $6,747.09.