市場沒有出現的價格成交低于市價500點秒內即輸

非常無恥的AI打盤，注意下方圖的成交時間有買升過市單止盈的，有買跌不能取消的訂單，各位看MFF的回覆
看來您誤解了兩個概念——交易價格和流動性。該工具的價格是當前的交易價格，賣方和買方同意資產的一定價值，并發生交換。流動性是另一個方面。您可以將其視為“柜臺交易”。對于交易的開倉或平倉，它要充滿流動性。如果您想以特定價格平倉或開倉，但沒有流動性，則會發生滑點 - 倉位以第一個價格開倉/平倉，有可能被填補。即使 X 價格當前不是正在進行資產交換的價格，也不意味著那里沒有流動性（買入/賣出訂單）。這是合理的——這就是訂單和真實市場的運作方式。這也不是我們可以彌補損失的事情，因為它與我們公司無關，這純粹是在真實市場條件下交易時自然發生的事情，不存在無限流動性的情況。我理解您的沮喪，但滑點是交易時的風險之一。
各位認為合理嗎？

以下為原文推薦

市場沒有出現的價格成交低於市價500點秒內即輸

非常無恥的AI打盤，注意下方圖的成交時間有買升過市單止盈的，有買跌不能取消的訂單，各位看結果
MFF的回覆
It seems you are mistaking two concepts - traded price and liquidity.

The price of the instrument, is the currently traded price, where sellers and buyers agree to a certain value of the asset, and exchange happens.
Liquidity is a different aspect. You can think of it as "counter orders". For a trade to open or close, it must have ability to be filled with the liquidity. If you want to close or open position at certain price, but it cannot get filled with liquidity, a slippage happens - the position opens/closes at first price there is possibility for it to get filled.

Even if X price is currently not the one where exchange of asset is taking place, it does not mean there is no liquidity there (buy/sell orders).
This is not something unreasonable - this is how orderbook and real markets work. It is neither something, for which losses we can rectify, since it is not related to our company, this is purely natural occurence when trading on real market conditions, where there is no such thing as unlimited liquidity. I understand your frustration, but slippage is simply one of the risks while trading.

各位認為合理嗎？