市场没有出现的价格成交低于市价500点秒内即输

非常无耻的AI打盘，注意下方图的成交时间有买升过市单止盈的，有买跌不能取消的订单，各位看MFF的回覆
看来您误解了两个概念——交易价格和流动性。该工具的价格是当前的交易价格，卖方和买方同意资产的一定价值，并发生交换。流动性是另一个方面。您可以将其视为“柜台交易”。对于交易的开仓或平仓，它要充满流动性。如果您想以特定价格平仓或开仓，但没有流动性，则会发生滑点 - 仓位以第一个价格开仓/平仓，有可能被填补。即使 X 价格当前不是正在进行资产交换的价格，也不意味着那里没有流动性（买入/卖出订单）。这是合理的——这就是订单和真实市场的运作方式。这也不是我们可以弥补损失的事情，因为它与我们公司无关，这纯粹是在真实市场条件下交易时自然发生的事情，不存在无限流动性的情况。我理解您的沮丧，但滑点是交易时的风险之一。
各位认为合理吗？

以下为原文推荐

市場沒有出現的價格成交低於市價500點秒內即輸

非常無恥的AI打盤，注意下方圖的成交時間有買升過市單止盈的，有買跌不能取消的訂單，各位看結果
MFF的回覆
It seems you are mistaking two concepts - traded price and liquidity.

The price of the instrument, is the currently traded price, where sellers and buyers agree to a certain value of the asset, and exchange happens.
Liquidity is a different aspect. You can think of it as "counter orders". For a trade to open or close, it must have ability to be filled with the liquidity. If you want to close or open position at certain price, but it cannot get filled with liquidity, a slippage happens - the position opens/closes at first price there is possibility for it to get filled.

Even if X price is currently not the one where exchange of asset is taking place, it does not mean there is no liquidity there (buy/sell orders).
This is not something unreasonable - this is how orderbook and real markets work. It is neither something, for which losses we can rectify, since it is not related to our company, this is purely natural occurence when trading on real market conditions, where there is no such thing as unlimited liquidity. I understand your frustration, but slippage is simply one of the risks while trading.

各位認為合理嗎？