简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The CFTC's counsel and JAFX's counsel have been in good faith conversations about a negotiated resolution of the problems stated in the Commission's complaint.
Less than one month after the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) indicated it was close to reaching a settlement in a case targeting unregistered FX broker JAFX, the parties have filed a proposed consent order with the Utah District Court.
The document, seen by FinanceFeeds, states that Counsel for the Commission and JAFX have engaged in good-faith discussions concerning a negotiated resolution of issues raised in the
Commissions Complaint. As a result of those negotiations, the Commission and JAFX have agreed to the entry of a Supplemental Consent Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable and Statutory Relief.
The proposed order provides that JAFX shall pay a civil monetary penalty of $600,000. The proposed Supplemental Consent Order resolves all issues remaining.
The CFTC and JAFX jointly move the Court to enter the Supplemental Consent Order, and to provide the parties any further and additional relief as the Court deems just and appropriate.
Lets recall that the CFTC charged JAFX, an offshore company claiming to operate from St Vincent and the Grenadines and Bulgaria, with violating the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations.
The CFTC Complaint against the broker says that, beginning in at least September 2016, JAFX has offered retail Forex services to customers in the United States. The entity has never been registered as a retail foreign exchange dealer (RFED) or in any other capacity with the CFTC.
The CFTC notes it has not received any application from JAFX. The US regulator alleges that JAFX operates as an unregistered foreign exchange dealer and has failed to provide a disclosure statement.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
SC Malaysia has been cautioned regarding Arab investment company. According to the Authority, a possible clone operating an illegal investment scheme offers high returns e.g.a return of RM3,000 in 24 hours with an investment of RM300. This entity does not carry a License.
SWIFT EARNERS has emerged as a controversial and highly dubious player. Despite its claims of being a reliable broker with a base in the United States and additional operations in Thailand, the experiences of numerous victims tell a different story. A particularly harrowing account comes from a South African victim who has found himself ensnared in what appears to be a well-orchestrated scam.
When searching for "RIF-CAPITAL" in WikiFX, we found that we have not yet confirmed its valid license information. WikiFX has received eight complaints against the trader in the past three months.
Trading in the financial markets, whether forex or cryptocurrency, can seem daunting for beginners. However, with the right approach and mindset, anyone can evolve from a rookie to a confident trader. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this journey.