简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a case against unlicensed Forex broker JAFX, which was finally dismissed by the Utah District Court.
The Utah District Court has finally closed a case brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against unregistered Forex broker JAFX.
Lets recall that the case was launched in July 2018. The CFTC Complaint alleged that, from at least September 2016 and continuing to the summer of 2018, JAFX operated as a retail foreign exchange (forex) dealer, without being registered with the CFTC, as required, and that it failed to provide customers with the required Risk Disclosure Statement.
Specifically, the CFTC‘s Complaint alleged that JAFX has been the counterparty to leveraged, retail forex transactions for customers located in the United States, who are not Eligible Contract Participants (ECPs). JAFX allegedly solicits orders from U.S. customers who are not ECPs to open leveraged, retail forex trading accounts through JAFX’s website, as well as videos on YouTube, where JAFX is, or offers to be, the counterparty to each leveraged retail forex transaction. Customers were directed to open trading accounts by submitting an online account application through JAFXs website, and JAFX encouraged customers to access and trade their accounts via a mobile application, according to the Complaint.
U.S. customers could allegedly open an account with JAFX for as little as $100.
In June 2020, a supplemental consent order was entered among the parties so that the case would be resolved. That order provided that JAFX will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $600,000. The proposed Supplemental Consent Order was said to have resolved all issues in the case.
However, the proceedings remained ongoing for unknown reason. On September 29, 2021, the Court finally issued an order closing the case. The lawsuit was terminated as per the supplemental consent order.
The Utah District Court has not been involved in Forex cases often. Apart from JAFX, another case that proceeded there was the CFTC lawsuit brought against Tallinex.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
SC Malaysia has been cautioned regarding Arab investment company. According to the Authority, a possible clone operating an illegal investment scheme offers high returns e.g.a return of RM3,000 in 24 hours with an investment of RM300. This entity does not carry a License.
SWIFT EARNERS has emerged as a controversial and highly dubious player. Despite its claims of being a reliable broker with a base in the United States and additional operations in Thailand, the experiences of numerous victims tell a different story. A particularly harrowing account comes from a South African victim who has found himself ensnared in what appears to be a well-orchestrated scam.
When searching for "RIF-CAPITAL" in WikiFX, we found that we have not yet confirmed its valid license information. WikiFX has received eight complaints against the trader in the past three months.
Trading in the financial markets, whether forex or cryptocurrency, can seem daunting for beginners. However, with the right approach and mindset, anyone can evolve from a rookie to a confident trader. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this journey.